Friday 20 June 2014

Financial advice: Say goodbye to family cottage before it's too late

 TORONTO -- After the unforgettable family gatherings, sunbathing on the dock and picture-perfect moments with the kids, it's hard to say goodbye to the cottage you've grown to love.
But financial advisers say that learning when to let go is a fundamental part of ensuring that your lakefront property doesn't become a bad investment.
"There's the romance of it, and there's the reality," said Jason Pereira, a senior financial consultant at Investment Planning Counsel in Toronto.
"The cottage is a place where you escape, but there's also its own series of responsibilities."
For cottage dwellers, that day is inevitable. Eventually you will face the dilemma of either selling the property or passing it down to your children, if you have them.
Neither option is easy and, in many cases, comes down to choosing the best time for the transition which, for tax purposes, will likely be after retirement when your annual income drops.
Financial advisers say one of the biggest mistakes cottage owners make is assuming that somebody else in the family actually loves the place as much as they do.
"A lot of people are quite preoccupied with keeping the property in the family, for some reason," said Christine Van Cauwenberghe, assistant vice president of tax and estate planning at Investors Group.
"People need to look at selling the cottage as a very viable solution."
Several advisers said they've seen instances where transitioning the ownership of the property created powerful rifts within the family. They suggest that cottage owners take a step back and ask themselves whether a few days at the beach should come at the expense of potentially destroying family relationships or shifting a financial burden onto their children's shoulders.
"Often you'll have two kids, and one will be financially successful and one will be not as financially successful," said Greg Rasmussen, an investment adviser at Manulife Financial in Muskoka, Ont., a popular cottage region.
"As soon as you transfer it into their name you're going to have that tax bill."
If one child can't afford the cottage, but the family insists on keeping it, then make special arrangements that are in writing. A promissory note can clearly outline the long-term financial expectations.
"Make sure that child is paying fair market value," Cauwenberghe said.
"Maybe it's not in cash, but in receiving that much less of the estate."
Even in a smooth transition of ownership, there's still years of potential fights ahead as siblings get saddled with the expenses of regular upkeep, taxes, and figuring out a way to share the property without bickering over whose family gets the place each weekend.
That's why advisers suggest that, unlike jewelry or silverware, a cottage shouldn't be treated like a family heirloom because it's not the kind of asset you can store in a drawer and forget about.
"A lot of people can't afford -- even on a divided basis -- to run them," said Tony Layton, chief executive of financial services company PWL Capital.
He said he's seen instances where children will gain possession of a cottage, but don't have time to maintain the property and let it fall into "semi-ruin."
Eventually those children can be forced to sell the cottage and -- depending on how much the value has appreciated over the years -- can be hit with a massive tax bill they can't afford.
In other instances, one child might want to sell the property while other others do not, which can lead to further problems if those situations aren't laid out in writing.
"If anything, you should have agreements in place that say: 'You can buy me out or I can force the sale,"' said Pereira.
"There almost has to be a prenup in place for the cottage to avoid those hazards down the road."
Cash proceeds are easier to divide amongst a group because its a relatively clear-cut process that involves more numbers and less emotion.

by David Friend, The Canadian Press

Friday 13 June 2014

HOME PRICES UP 0.8% IN MAY

In May the Teranet-National Bank National Composite House Price Index™ was up 0.8% from the previous month. This increase, though substantial in itself, was the fifth smallest for May in the 16 years covered by the index. The countrywide composite index rose to an all-time high, but only three of the 11 metropolitan markets surveyed did the same. Prices were up from the previous month in seven markets and by more than the national average in five. The 3.1% monthly gain in Halifax was the largest in the history of that market. Prices rose 2.0% in Hamilton, 1.6% in Quebec City, 1.3% in Toronto, 1.1% in Calgary, 0.6% in Edmonton and 0.5% in Montreal. Calgary's advance was the fourth in a row exceeding 1%, taking prices to a new high. New records were also reached in Hamilton and Toronto. Prices were unchanged from the month before in Ottawa-Gatineau and Vancouver. The reading for Vancouver ended 12 consecutive months of rising prices. Prices were down from the previous month in Victoria (−0.1%) and Winnipeg (−0.3%).

Since in May 2013 the monthly rise of the composite index was 1.1%, this May's 0.8% rise meant that 12 month home price inflation decelerated 0.3 percentage points to 4.6%, where it was in March. For the third month in a row, prices were down from a year earlier in all four markets east of Toronto: Quebec City (−1.6%), Ottawa-Gatineau (−1.4%), Montreal (−1.2%) and Halifax (−0.4%). In Victoria prices were flat from a year earlier. The 12-month rise trailed the countrywide average in Winnipeg (+1.0%) and Edmonton (+2.6%) and led it in Hamilton (+5.9%), Toronto (+6.0%), Vancouver (+8.2%) and Calgary (+8.7%). The softness of prices east of Toronto is consistent with the excess supply prevailing in the resale markets of these metropolitan areas. That being said, market conditions are generally balanced elsewhere, and are even tight in Calgary.
Source Terranet National Housing Bank Price Index

Wednesday 11 June 2014

Joe Oliver’s hands-off stance on mortgages a ‘mistake’ in overheated market, warns Sun Life

  Canadian Finance Minister Joe Oliver’s hands-off stance on mortgage rates is a mistake in an overheated housing market, Sadiq Adatia, chief investment officer at Sun Life Global Investments Inc., said. Canadian lenders including Bank of Nova Scotia cut five- year fixed mortgage rates below 3% this spring. While Oliver said in May he would “monitor the market closely,” similar moves last year by banks elicited a rebuke from former Finance Minister Jim Flaherty. The low rates didn’t last.
Reposted from the Financial Post by Steven Porter, Broker - RE/MAX Aboutowne Realty Corp.

Monday 2 June 2014

CMHC drops some mortgage insurance products

 Jun 2, 2014
Canada Mortgage and Housing Corp. has discontinued the Second Home and Self-Employed Without 3rd Party Income Validation mortgage insurance products. Self-employed Canadians can still qualify for CMHC-insured financing through CMHC homeowner products with a validation of their income using traditional methods.

The federal housing agency says the two programs combined account for less than three per cent of CMHC’s insured business volumes in units. “Given the limited use of these products, their discontinuation is not expected to have a material impact on the housing market,” says the agency.

CMHC introduced its Self Employed Without Traditional 3rd Party Validation of Income product in 2007. The product allowed self-employed borrowers who were unable to provide traditional sources of income validation to access CMHC-insured financing for a one or two-unit owner-occupied property.

CMHC introduced the Second Home product in 2005. It offered borrowers more financing options when purchasing an owner-occupied second home in Canada.

CMHC says it will limit the availability of homeowner mortgage loan insurance to only one property (one to four units) per borrower/co-borrower at any given time.

Posted by Steven Porter, Broker, REMAX Aboutowne Realty Corp.